[1]何艳斌,林清,王斐,等.行为量表联合电生理检查对颅脑损伤意识障碍患者预后的评估[J].临床神经外科杂志,2017,14(06):437-440.
 HE Yan-bin,LIN Qing,WANG Fei,et al.Combination of hehavioral scale and neuroelectrophysiological examination in prognosis of patients with disorders of consciousness[J].Journal of Clinical Neurosurgery,2017,14(06):437-440.
点击复制

行为量表联合电生理检查对颅脑损伤意识障碍患者预后的评估()
分享到:

《临床神经外科杂志》[ISSN:1672-7770/CN:32-1727/R]

卷:
14
期数:
2017年06期
页码:
437-440
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2017-12-19

文章信息/Info

Title:
Combination of hehavioral scale and neuroelectrophysiological examination in prognosis of patients with disorders of consciousness
作者:
何艳斌林清王斐章洁纯虞容豪谢秋幼潘家辉潘速跃
510515广州,南方医科大学(何艳斌,潘速跃);广州军区广州总医院神经康复科昏迷研究组(何艳斌,林清,虞容豪,章洁纯,谢秋幼);华南理工大学自动化科学与工程学院(王斐,潘家辉)
Author(s):
HE Yan-binLIN QingWANG Feiet al
Southern Medical University,Guangzhou 510515,China
关键词:
意识障碍预后脑电图昏迷恢复量表体感诱发电位脑机接口
Keywords:
disorders of consciousnessprognosisEEGCRS-RSEPbrain computer interface
分类号:
R651.15
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的:探讨行为量表联合电生理检查对颅脑损伤后意识障碍(DOC)患者预后评估的价值。方法:回顾性分析49例脑损伤后意识障碍患者的临床资料。给患者进行昏迷恢复量表(CRS-R)评分、常规神经电生理及脑机接口(BCI)检测、格拉斯哥预后量表(GOS)评分,将结果划分不同等级。采用二元Logistic回归分析法,建立回归模型,并绘制模型对应的ROC曲线判断模型评估预后的价值。结果:单因素分析发现,两组患者脑电图(EEG)分级、CRS-R评分、体感诱发电位(SEP)分级及BCI检测在线准确率比较,差异均有统计学意义(均P< 0.05)。Logistic回归分析发现,BCI在线准确率与患者预后的相关性最强(OR = 9.483,P = 0.036),EEG等级(OR = 7.765,P =0.043)及SEP等级(OR=7.075,P=0.047)次之。绘制ROC曲线发现,联合4种方法综合所对应的AUC值最高,为0.920(P=0.039)。结论:CRS-R评分、EEG、SEP及BCI均能较好地评估DOC患者的预后;而4种方法联合检测的准确率更高,值得在临床推广。
Abstract:
Objective:To explore the value of combination of behavioral scale and neuroelectro-physiological examination in prognosis of patients with disorders of consciousness(DOC).Methods:The clinical data of 49 patients with disorders of consciousness were analyzed retrospectively.The scores of behavioral scale and results of neuroelectrophysiological examination and brain computer interface(BCI) were collected and graded.Glasgow outcome scale(GOS) was used to assess the prognosis of DOC patients.Bilateral logistic regression analysis was used to determine whether those methods can predict outcome of DOC accurately or not and its extent.ROC curve was drawn to detect the value of the model.Results Univariate analysis showed that EEG,CRS-R score,SEP and online accuracy of BCI were different significantly(P<0.05).Logistic multivariate analysis showed that BCI (OR=9.483,P=0.036)correlated with the prognosis most significantly,then next were EEG(OR=7.765,P=0.043)and SEP(OR=7.075,P=0.047).AUC of the four methods integration was better than any single method.Conclusion:CRS-R score,EEG,SEP and BCI can be used to evaluate the prognosis of DOC patients,but integration of these four methods is much better and should be applied widely.

相似文献/References:

[1]汪洋,伍碧武,张义.调强放疗联合替莫唑胺治疗丘脑胶质瘤[J].临床神经外科杂志,2015,(01):5.
[2]许慧中,颜庆华,邵柏.慢性硬膜下血肿治疗体会(附151例报告)[J].临床神经外科杂志,2015,(02):140.
[3]孟大伟,石林,刘焕光.颞叶癫痫患者手术后早期发作对远期疗效的影响[J].临床神经外科杂志,2015,(03):185.
[4]林志红,王逢鹏,姚一,等.术前和术后脑电图在预测功能性大脑半球切除术癫痫控制效果中的意义[J].临床神经外科杂志,2015,(03):214.
[5]李嵌嵌,王鹏,詹升全,等.动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血脑脊液可溶性Fas、Fas配体水平的变化与脑积水发生及预后的关系[J].临床神经外科杂志,2015,(04):283.
[6]夏松松,林志国.岛叶癫痫进展[J].临床神经外科杂志,2015,(04):306.
[7]曾剑平,刘青,林志雄.脑胶质瘤病人预后相关影响因素分析[J].临床神经外科杂志,2015,(06):410.
[8]周杰,马建荣,谷欣.APACHE IV评分评估重症颅脑外伤的预后价值[J].临床神经外科杂志,2015,(06):426.
[9]程峰,张曙光,李晓良,等.颅内压监测在自发性脑出血术后的临床应用[J].临床神经外科杂志,2015,(06):457.
[10]刘保华,熊方令,蔡旺,等.动态颅内压监测对重型颅脑损伤标准大骨瓣减压术后治疗的意义[J].临床神经外科杂志,2014,(02):128.
[11]赵继宗.意识障碍临床诊疗的现状与进展[J].临床神经外科杂志,2020,17(01):1.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-7770.2020.01.001]
 ZHAO Ji-zong.Clinical diagnosis and treatment of consciousness disorders[J].Journal of Clinical Neurosurgery,2020,17(06):1.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-7770.2020.01.001]
[12]何江弘,杨艺,夏小雨,等.《2018年版美国意识障碍实践指南》解读[J].临床神经外科杂志,2020,17(01):4.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-7770.2020.01.002]
 HE Jiang-hong,YANG Yi,XIA Xiao-yu,et al.Interpretation of the practice guideline update recommendations summary: disorders of consciousness[J].Journal of Clinical Neurosurgery,2020,17(06):4.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-7770.2020.01.002]

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01