[1]叶亮亮,赵鹏来,薛元峰,等.颅内压监测在高血压脑出血治疗中的应用[J].临床神经外科杂志,2018,15(06):469-472.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-7770.2018.06.018]
 YE Liang-liang,ZHAO Peng-lai,XUE Yuan-feng,et al.Application of intracranial pressure monitoring in treatment of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage[J].Journal of Clinical Neurosurgery,2018,15(06):469-472.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-7770.2018.06.018]
点击复制

颅内压监测在高血压脑出血治疗中的应用()
分享到:

《临床神经外科杂志》[ISSN:1672-7770/CN:32-1727/R]

卷:
15
期数:
2018年06期
页码:
469-472
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2018-12-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Application of intracranial pressure monitoring in treatment of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage
作者:
叶亮亮赵鹏来薛元峰许健杨平来
211200 南京,南京市溧水区人民医院神经外科(叶亮亮,赵鹏来,薛元峰,许健,杨平来);南京医科大学附属脑科医院神经外科(赵鹏来)
Author(s):
YE Liang-liangZHAO Peng-laiXUE Yuan-fenget al.
Department of Neurosurgery,Lishui Peoples’s Hospital,Nanjing 211200,China
关键词:
高血压脑出血颅内压监测平均住院时间
Keywords:
hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhageintracranial pressure monitoringaverage length of stay
分类号:
R651.1
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1672-7770.2018.06.018
文献标志码:
D
摘要:
【摘要】目的探讨颅内压监测在高血压脑出血患者治疗中的指导价值和临床意义。 方法回顾性分析溧水区人民医院2016年1月至2017年12月50例高血压脑出血手术患者的临床资料。其中对照组25例,主要手术方式为脑内血肿清除术;ICP监测组25例,主要手术方式为脑内血肿清除+颅内压监测术。对比两组患者术后再出血和并发症的发生率,以及平均住院时间。 结果术后再出血:ICP监测组为2例(8%),对照组为8例(32%);术后并发症:ICP监测组为5例(20%),对照组为12例(48%);两组术后再出血及并发症的发生率比较,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。平均住院时间:ICP监测组为(12.08±3.46)d,对照组为(14.44±4.25)d,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论通过持续监测颅内压值的变化,指导合理的治疗措施,可降低术后再出血及并发症的发生率及脱水剂对肝肾功能的影响,缩短平均住院时间。
Abstract:
Abstract:ObjectiveTo explore the guiding value and clinical significance of intracranial pressure(ICP) monitoring in the treatment of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage(HICH).MethodsThe clinical data of 50 patients with HICH from January 2016 to December 2017 were analyzed retrospectively.25 patients in the control group were treated as intracerebral hematoma clearance and 25 in the treatment group.The main surgical methods were intracerebral hematoma clearance and ICP monitoring.The incidence of postoperative rebleeding,the incidence of complications and the average length of stay of the two groups were compared.ResultsPostoperative rebleeding showed 2 cases (8%) were in the treatment group and 8 (32%) in the control group,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The incidence of clinical complications showed 5 cases (20%) were in the treatment group and 12 (48%) in the control group,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The average length of stay in the treatment group was (12.08±3.46) d,and the control group was (14.44±4.25) d,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).ConclusionThrough continuous monitoring of changes in ICP and guiding reasonable treatment measures,it can reduce the side effect of dehydrating agent on liver and kidney function,shorten the average length of stay.

相似文献/References:

[1]王志明,殷尚炯,王阳春,等.持续颅内压监测在小脑出血手术中的应用(附16例报告)[J].临床神经外科杂志,2014,(01):72.
[2]孙伟,钱忠心,刘卫东.弥散张量成像在高血压性脑出血后皮质脊髓束损伤中的应用研究[J].临床神经外科杂志,2015,(03):230.
[3]徐定凯,洪兴国,高德玉,等.颅内压监测对重型创伤性颅脑损伤患者临床疗效的Meta分析[J].临床神经外科杂志,2015,(06):430.
[4]程峰,张曙光,李晓良,等.颅内压监测在自发性脑出血术后的临床应用[J].临床神经外科杂志,2015,(06):457.
[5]刘保华,熊方令,蔡旺,等.动态颅内压监测对重型颅脑损伤标准大骨瓣减压术后治疗的意义[J].临床神经外科杂志,2014,(02):128.
[6]张宏兵,王晓峰,唐宗椿,等.颅内压监测在高血压脑出血置管引流治疗中的应用[J].临床神经外科杂志,2014,(03):219.
[7]狄广福.闪光视觉诱发电位在颅脑损伤监测中的作用[J].临床神经外科杂志,2014,(03):234.
[8]周临军,王鑫,唐献江.维吾尔族、汉族高血压脑出血手术治疗的临床及病理分析[J].临床神经外科杂志,2014,(05):350.
[9]魏雪峰,曹富裕,李宗正.三种不同方式治疗高血压脑基底节区出血的回顾性临床研究[J].临床神经外科杂志,2014,(06):456.
[10]祝海平,孔刚,陈进,等.颅内压监测在侧裂-岛叶入路清除基底节区血肿术后的应用[J].临床神经外科杂志,2014,(06):462.

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01