[1]陈毅,刘晓东,李晋虎,等.联合单节段零切迹椎间融合器治疗三节段脊髓型颈椎病技术[J].临床神经外科杂志,2020,17(04):371-377.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-7770.2020.04.003]
 CHEN Yi,LIU Xiao-dong,LI Jin-hu,et al.Clinical effect analysis of single-segment Zero-Profile intervertebral fusion cage in treatment of three-segment cervical spondylotic myelopathy[J].Journal of Clinical Neurosurgery,2020,17(04):371-377.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-7770.2020.04.003]
点击复制

联合单节段零切迹椎间融合器治疗三节段脊髓型颈椎病技术()
分享到:

《临床神经外科杂志》[ISSN:1672-7770/CN:32-1727/R]

卷:
17
期数:
2020年04期
页码:
371-377
栏目:
脊柱脊髓专题
出版日期:
2020-08-14

文章信息/Info

Title:
Clinical effect analysis of single-segment Zero-Profile intervertebral fusion cage in treatment of three-segment cervical spondylotic myelopathy
文章编号:
202004003
作者:
陈毅刘晓东李晋虎杨雪莹王宏勤范益民郑安潮刘跃亭
030001 太原,山西医科大学第一临床医学院(陈毅,杨雪莹);山西医科大学第一医院神经外科(刘晓东,李晋虎,王宏勤,范益民,郑安潮,刘跃亭)
Author(s):
CHEN Yi LIU Xiao-dong LI Jin-hu et al.
First Clinical Medical College, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan 030001, China
关键词:
脊髓型颈椎病手术治疗植骨融合内固定零切迹
Keywords:
cervical spondylotic myelopathy surgical treatment ACDF Zero-P
分类号:
R651.2
DOI:
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-7770.2020.04.003
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的对比颈前路联合应用单节段零切迹椎间融合器与常规锁定钛板治疗三节段脊髓型颈椎病的临床疗效。方法回顾性分析18例采用颈前路椎间盘切除减压融合术(ACDF)+双节段锁定钛板固定系统+单节段零切迹椎间融合固定系统(联合组)和20例采用常规颈前路ACDF+三节段锁定钛板固定系统(常规组)患者的临床资料。分析两组患者术前、术后各指标及术后随访。结果联合组在手术时间、术中出血量、术后邻近节段退变率方面均明显优于常规组(均P<0.001)。两组患者术前及术后各随访时间点的VAS、JOA评分及颈椎Cobb角比较,差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。末次随访时根据改良Macnab疗效评定标准,常规组优12例、良5例、可3例,优良率为85%;联合组优11例、良4例、可3例,优良率为83.3%。末次随访时两组间Ⅰ级融合率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论颈前路联合零切迹椎间融合器治疗三节段脊髓型颈椎病可以取得与常规锁定钛板一样的疗效,但在缩短手术时间、减少术中出血量、降低邻近节段退变率以及降低手术难度方面具有优势。
Abstract:
To compare the clinical effect of anterior cervical approach combined with single-segment Zero-P intervertebral fusion cage and conventional locking titanium plate in the treatment of three-segment cervical spondylotic myelopathy. MethodsThe clinical data of 18 patients with ACDF+two-segment locking titanium plate fixation system+single-segment Zero-P intervertebral fusion fixation system(combined group) and 20 patients with conventional ACDF+three-segment locking titanium plate fixation system(conventional group),were analyzed retrospectively. Preoperative and postoperative indicators and postoperative follow-up were analyzed in the two groups. ResultsThe combined group was superior to the conventional group in operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative incidence of adjacent segment degeneration(all P<0.001). VAS, JOA score and Cobb Angle of cervical vertebra at each follow-up time point before and after operation were not significantly different between the two groups(all P>0.05). According to the modified Macnab standard at the last follow-up, 12 cases were excellent, 5 were good, and 3 were acceptable in the conventional group, with an excellent and good rate of 85%. In the combined group, 11 cases were excellent, 4 were good, and 3 were acceptable, with an excellent and good rate of 83.3%. At the time of the last follow-up, Ⅰ level fusion rate between the two groups compare difference has no statistical significance(P>0.05). ConclusionsIn the treatment of three-segment cervical spondylotic myelopathy, anterior cervical approach combined with Zero-P intervertebral fusion cage can achieve the same clinical effect as conventional locking titanium plate, but it has advantages in shortening the operation time, decrease intraoperative blood loss, reducing the incidence of adjacent segment degeneration, and lower the difficulty of operation.

相似文献/References:

[1]徐祎,杜世伟,高天.腕管镜下Chow法手术治疗糖尿病腕管综合征[J].临床神经外科杂志,2015,(01):58.
[2]李云翔,费舟.脑挫裂伤手术与非手术治疗对照研究[J].临床神经外科杂志,2014,(02):140.
[3]张杰,高晋健,吴建兵,等.伽玛刀与手术治疗颞叶癫痫的疗效分析[J].临床神经外科杂志,2014,(04):265.
[4]徐勇,林爱明,刘佳骐.预见性双侧去骨瓣减压与相继性双侧去骨瓣减压治疗重型颅脑损伤临床疗效的差异性分析[J].临床神经外科杂志,2014,(06):470.
 Xu Yong,Lin Aiming,Liu Jia Qi.Clinical features and Surgical treatment of traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage[J].Journal of Clinical Neurosurgery,2014,(04):470.
[5]王金龙,刘亚军,罗坤,等.脊柱旁与椎管内节细胞神经瘤的临床诊断及外科手术治疗[J].临床神经外科杂志,2017,14(05):356.
 WANG Jin-long,LIU Ya-jun,LUO Kun,et al.Clinical diagnosis and surgical treatment of paravertebral and spinal ganglioneuroma[J].Journal of Clinical Neurosurgery,2017,14(04):356.
[6]贡伟一,周金方,王文明.小脑出血的手术治疗(附35例临床分析)[J].临床神经外科杂志,2018,15(01):62.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-7770.2018.01.015]
 GONG Wei-yi,ZHOU Jin-fang,WANG Wen-ming..Surgical treatment of cerebellar hemorrhage (a clinical analysis of 35 cases)[J].Journal of Clinical Neurosurgery,2018,15(04):62.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-7770.2018.01.015]
[7]闫天芳,刘钊,刘攀,等.3D1H-MRS多模态成像技术辅助下扩大胶质瘤手术切除范围的研究[J].临床神经外科杂志,2018,15(06):452.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-7770.2018.06.013]
 YAN Tian-fang,LIU Zhao,LIU Pan,et al.Reaserch on enlarged surgical resection range of glioma with assistant of 3D1H-MRS multimodal imaging[J].Journal of Clinical Neurosurgery,2018,15(04):452.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-7770.2018.06.013]
[8]姚林,冯鸣,王杭州,等.硬脊膜外脓肿4例临床分析[J].临床神经外科杂志,2019,16(1):41.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-7770.2019.01.009]
 YAO Lin,FENG Ming,WANG Hang-zhou,et al.Clinical analysis of spinal epidural abscess[J].Journal of Clinical Neurosurgery,2019,16(04):41.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-7770.2019.01.009]
[9]宋晨,张楠楠,胡喻,等.垂体腺瘤手术治疗中对垂体功能保护的研究[J].临床神经外科杂志,2019,16(2):115.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-7770.2019.02.005]
 SONG Chen,ZHANG Nan-nan,HU Yu,et al.Functional protection during operations of pituitary adenoma[J].Journal of Clinical Neurosurgery,2019,16(04):115.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-7770.2019.02.005]
[10]耿锋,张志文,杨非,等.大骨瓣开颅术治疗重症高血压脑出血的疗效分析[J].临床神经外科杂志,2019,16(3):273.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-7770.2019.03.020]
 GENG Feng,ZHANG Zhi-wen,YANG Fei,et al.Effectiveness analysis on large bone craniectomy for severe hypertensive hemorrhage[J].Journal of Clinical Neurosurgery,2019,16(04):273.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-7770.2019.03.020]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
刘晓东 ,山西医科大学第一医院神经外科,中共党员,博士,副教授,硕士生导师。中国医师协会神经外科医师分会脊髓脊柱专家委员会全国委员,中华医学会神经外科分会脊柱脊髓学组秘书,世界华人神经外科分会脊柱脊髓专家委员会委员,中国医师协会神经发育畸形修复专业学组全国委员,山西省健康协会脊柱脊髓专业委员会副主任委员兼秘书长,国家老年疾病临床医学研究中心脊柱微创联盟山西分中心负责人,中华中医药学会脊柱微创专家委员会委员,山西省医师协会神经外科分会神经脊柱学组委员,山西省医学会神经外科分会青年委员,山西省高校131领军人才。在首都医科大学宣武医院为期一年系统学习颅底显微技术及脊柱神经外科技术。擅长利用显微镜和内镜技术对颈腰椎病进行微创精准个体化治疗。
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-08-14